![]() ![]() ![]() The bottom line is that all of the facts of an automobile accident must be evaluated by competent, qualified individuals. Just looking at the police report is not always going to give you the true cause of the crash. Word vs Word Claim for car accident, how do I fight it and do I have a chance I was hit by another car on the highway when it was raining. In addition, the police officer formulated his opinion that the taillight wasn’t working based on the fact that it was not working after the accident-after the car had been rammed from behind. It is very likely that the taillight was working before the accident but the force of the impact broke the filament in the brake light, which is why it didn’t work after the accident. The police report’s conclusion regarding fault was not accurate. What must be remembered, however, is that the police report is not the final word regarding fault. The Scott Ray Law Firm was recently contacted by an individual injured in an automobile crash where the police report indicated that our client was at fault because one of his taillights was not working. A closer look at what happened revealed that the driver that rear-ended our client was not looking where he was going when the crash occurred. Thus, whether the taillight was working or not wasn't relevant since the at-fault driver wasn’t even looking ahead, so he would not have seen the taillight had it been working. The police report is also used by insurance companies to help them determine how the accident happened. Thus, if the police report indicates that the accident was your fault, the defense attorney and the insurance company that employs him will make up their minds that the accident was your fault and will not offer to pay for your damages (or offer very little). To provide a baseline for the Decade, data was collated for the "European facts and Global status report on road safety 2015".The first thing to understand is how the police report is used. The police report is not admissible in evidence at a trial. It is hearsay. It does, however, give the attorneys some of the information that the police officer gathered at the scene of the accident when conducting his investigation. From that information, the attorneys (for both sides) can reconstruct how the accident happened and whose fault it was. This seeks to actively support countries in achieving the goals of the Decade of Action for Road Safety, which are to reduce the unnecessary deaths and disabilities on the roads. WHO/Europe’s activities aim to help ensure road safety and prevent road traffic injuries by collating evidence on health effects and prevention measures, identifying risk factors and promoting policy action and evidence-based interventions. Originating in European countries like the Netherlands and Sweden, this approach to road safety recognizes that the human body is highly vulnerable to injury and that humans make mistakes, but a set of complementary interventions to create safer roads, safer vehicles and safer road users can accommodate driver error and prevent crashes from resulting in injury or loss of life. WHO recommends a “safe systems” approach to road safety. WHO provides technical support to Member States of the Region to develop, implement, monitor and evaluate data-driven and evidence-based actions for road safety. Recognizing its public health and international development priority, road safety is a key target under the Sustainable Development Goals, with a 50% reduction in road traffic fatalities called for by 2020. Road traffic injuries are not “accidents” – which is defined as a random, unpredictable and unpreventable event – they have risk factors, predictors and determinants, and are therefore preventable. Such an achievement is cause for momentary celebration and a reinvigoration of efforts. Between 20, road traffic mortality reduced by 33%, compared to a global average that increased by 20%. Road traffic mortality is also widely disparate in the countries of the European Region, with countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States having a road traffic mortality rate 3 times higher than the countries of the European Union.ĭespite these levels of trauma, significant progress is being made in the countries of the Region. ![]() Almost 40% of those killed are the vulnerable road users – the pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists. Every death is just the tip of the iceberg, with millions more people non-fatally injured to various severities, many with life-long consequences. Road trauma kills more people aged 5–14 than any other cause and is the second leading cause of death for those aged 15–29. Every 6 minutes someone dies on the roads of the WHO European Region – 230 people each day, 83 000 people every year. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |